[History] Keith Stuart / The Guardian - "Should gamers be accountable Mongoose, War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says Oct. 3, 2013, 12:16 AM PDT By Henry Austin, NBC News contributor The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video. Advertisement. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. 311 6. . "We're not asking for censorship, we don't want to take any elements out of the games," he said. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. How would Russia be held accountable if convicted of war crimes? - NBC News 03/10/2013 Guardian Games Blog The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws Don't shoot the civilians. It'd make hell of a lot of sense to add to the realism. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Picture memes VAtdEyCz8 by Executive_Villager: 237 comments - ) This topic makes me laugh. I don't see where Red Cross is calling for gamers to be punished. If I think too hard on how this level of insanity and/or sheer stupidity came about I'm going to bust my brain. I mean saved in the last 6 years, Every Minecraft player would go to jail for villager trafficking, I may have committed Genozide in multiple villages and also took war prisoners, creepy is Im not even the worst, Ummm . I remember my first go on Taitos explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video games to punish crimes committed in battle by adhering to real-life international war conventions. /v/ - >Skyrim belongs to the Nords. Imagine siding with - Video Games Quote: The Red Cross wants to have a greater influence in the virtual world of battlefields. One question though, is "Teabagging" a war crime? *snort* I would love to see them try to arrest and charge that many people smfh, its a fake world, full of fake people, me and the boys on our way to the execution chamber. As for war crime laws themselves they aren't working terribly well, if the Bush years taught us anything, but that probably a rant for another day. Tzu would probably fall under villain now a days, as he uses real tactics to slaughter us all and take over the world while we sit here and try to "play by the rules". The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. The ICRC says sanitizing video games is not realistic. to FFXIV. It's political correctness gone mad, though I fear this goes deeper than that and is more of a spin on the usual attempt for the mainstream media - and their various allies - to paint large portions of the gaming community as budding psychopaths. In Operation Wolf, accidentally machine gunning a glitching sprite that vaguely resembled a non-military human could be easily divorced from the reality of armed conflict. ZOMBIES AREN'T PEOPLE ANYMORE! Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? All of us: #starwars #battlefront #should #gamers #accountable #game #war. if someone actually implemented this. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. Thread: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes The problem with most Crime shows or series. The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. IFunny Brazil is fun of your life. Our Discord Server can be found in the sidebar below. The ICRC says it is now working directly with the developers of modern military simulations and the BBC report contains an interview with Marek Spanel of Bohemia Interactive, creator of the Arma series, who claims the studio's games will now be implementing the suggestions. This is ehy gamers are the most oppressed people in society. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? How do you move beyond the simple message, "Mission failed, you have broken international law and will spend the next ten years in prison. 16 mar 2022. I don't think anything like this would ever go in, but I'd still be intrigued by a game that did have more than just "go pew pew pew everything" as part of the gameplay. In Battlefield 5 or Call of Duty 27, it may not be so simple to dismiss the sight of a photo-realistic person lying in the dust, eyes rolling back, limbs spasming. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. Though I actually play pretty nice. WWI and WWI would have been lost to evil, had we played by the rules of the Red Cross and UN. Great list, but it sounds like you need to play Plague Inc. Plague.Inc and People Playground players: My testificate genocide of 2018 is about to unleashed upon the brains of the public. Keith Stuart: The Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws, punishing player characters for war crimes. And it probably helps explain just how . Its difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.. Macsiurtain_2019 6 may 2020 605 30 These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, youll probably get a mission failed message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. We are, though, surely heading into an era where gamers will have to take greater responsibility for their actions if only because the visual fidelity will be there to splatter our violent failings across the screen in HD detail. Our intention is not to spoil player's enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. In the heat of the game, facing a furious mob, many players will take the lethal option but they sure as hell think about it. Last I checked, I'm out and about hunting bad guys whether they're the Covenant from the 'Halo' series or terrorists bad guys in 'Modern Warfare'. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Video games that represent contemporary battlefields are very close to reality, he said. I dunno, it just frustrates me that people keep poking s**t when there is obviously nothing wrong with it. TheCommittee has released a statement in which it outlines its desire to collaborate with video game developers to show the consequences of a player's actions if they engage in virtual torture, the harming of civilians, attacks on medical personnel, or anything else covered by theGeneva Convention. Ill be 100% on board.. the second democrats are held to the constitution. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? All of us: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes Meanwhile everyone Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? How the left is pushing us toward civil war, and how this has worked in the past. The fear is that eventually such illegal acts will be perceived as acceptable behavior., Bernard Barrett, a spokesman for the organization said they were not trying to censor games or spoil peoples fun, but rather, make clear that there are rules in battle and that certain acts are illegal.. By I thought that was the whole reasoning behind online gaming tears are just so sweet . Vladimir Putin must be held accountable for war crimes in Ukraine You are using an out of date browser. Hello! The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. TikTok video from TommyKay (@tommykaydaily): "Should gamers go to jail for ingame war crimes? Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Persona Sie 18 Sep 2022 00:17:51 . The ICRC believes there is a place for international humanitarian law (the law of armed conflict) in video games, the organization that works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people caught in war zones said in a statement on their website. Though now that i stop to think about it, is modern war anything other than it twitched shoot it? Next thing you know, the Red Cross will want to require psych evals for people that have thoughts contrary to their rules. ShOuLD GAmers bE aCcOunTaBle foR iN gAmE wAr cRiMeS | Let's Talk It sounds to me more like some guy's personal vendetta against gamers. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. The game may be over but the choices remain and by ending chapter of Waking Dead with a guide to the actions of other players, developer Telltale Games cleverly addresses and confronts the process. The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. - various concepts for suit add-ons and effects. Founded by Frank Galli in 2000, Snipers Hide has been offering informational videos, podcasts, and other support to its users in one location. this was a few nights ago, took forever to upload after the capture. and our The sequence was brave, but also clumsily handled, exploitative and incongruous; however, it did place the player in a position where many felt they genuinely had to weigh up their moral proclivities with the demands of the gameplay mission. A Q&A document posted on the organization's website. It is also only suggesting this for games that represent realistic military situations. I don't think it's a bad idea from my completely subjective moral standpoint. A well disciplined enemy! The ICRC is focusing strictly on games that "simulate real-war situations." If you'd like to support our work with a donation, see here or choose Paypal or Patreon. Seriously, including this sort of responsible realism isn't going to spoil anyone's fun. Schadenfreude420 7 oct 2021. I play Stellaris and in that game I literally enslave, genocide, displace entire species and one of the things I can do is eat them/work them to death. You want grief? Sun Tzu would probably laugh at all of it. The jury of Tenno looking in disbelief as the defense lawyer starts committing more war crimes against the plaintiffs to prove Saryn's innocence meanwhile the Judge is either joining in on the war crimes or died instantly. Of course, this was really more about mechanics than ethics: players were being tested on their reactions and visual awareness, and failure meant a reduction in game time rather than a few moments reflection on innocent victims. Yeeeeah, I'm doomed if they manage to do anything with this. ShOuLD GAmers bE aCcOunTaBle foR iN gAmE wAr cRiMeS | Let's Talk War Loch 393 subscribers Subscribe 194 Share 4.9K views 2 years ago Sorry about the gusts of breath, As most of you probs. 431 39. Dont shoot the civilians. Yes that will make games soooo much more enjoyable by inserting nagging fucking lawyers. Gamers should be rewarded for in game war crimes. Via CNET | Source International Committee of the Red Cross. 1.8K 106. That's all I'll say. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. >_>. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? Avance de Crime Boss: RockayCity,Probamos el nuevo shooter cooperativo de Ingame Studios y 505 Games, con un reparto de lujo y algunas ideas bastante atractivas. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. The world must hold Vladimir Putin and his inner circle accountable for international crimes war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression . NPR's A Martinez talks to White House deputy national security adviser Jon Finer about options available to the U.S. and its allies for holding Russia responsible for alleged war crimes. Should non-gamers be accountable for real-world war crimes? Talk about a victimless crime. Our intention is not to spoil player's enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes - funny, gamers, accountable, in-game, crimes. Just a 'Hey, you know what would be nice? Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. I was just following orders. Unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement; Other serious violations of the laws and customs applicable in international armed conflict, within the established framework of international law, namely, any of the following acts: Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities; Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives; Intentionally directing attacks against personnel, installations, material, units or vehicles involved in a humanitarian assistance or peacekeeping mission in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, as long as they are entitled to the protection given to civilians or civilian objects under the international law of armed conflict; Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated; Attacking or bombarding, by whatever means, towns, villages, dwellings or buildings which are undefended and which are not military objectives; Destroying or seizing the enemy's property unless such destruction or seizure be imperatively demanded by the necessities of war; Pillaging a town or place, even when taken by assault; Employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices; Employing weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare which are of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering or which are inherently indiscriminate in violation of the international law of armed conflict, provided that such weapons, projectiles and material and methods of warfare are the subject of a comprehensive prohibition and are included in an annex to this Statute, by an amendment in accordance with the relevant provisions set forth in articles 121 and 123; Intentionally directing attacks against buildings, material, medical units and transport, and personnel using the distinctive emblems of the Geneva Conventions in conformity with international law; Intentionally using starvation of civilians as a method of warfare by depriving them of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supplies as provided for under the Geneva Conventions; Conscripting or enlisting children under the age of fifteen years into the national armed forces or using them to participate actively in hostilities. Should Games be Held Accountable for their Moral Implications? Persona Sie. The failure of modern warfare is that it places way to much value on the lives of civilians. There's just as much war crimes done in CoD series as in GTA, People Playground, *gun shots* *explosions* *carnage* *destroying the flesh with thrusters* *torture* *genocide* *brutality* *injecting literal acid into humans* *drowning* *reviving* *repeat* *lava* *crushing* *stretching* *flamethrower* *chainsaw* *so much more*. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Need for speed players Blade and sorcery players . 317 comment. Players need to be able to live with the consequences of actions in more subtle ways. Remember, no russian. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? I loved how when the GTA series first came into the public and right away people were saying it's nothing but a game where you kill cops all day. W2RhdGEtdG9vbHNldC1ibG9ja3MtZmllbGRzLWFuZC10ZXh0PSJmNWNlOGM4OGFiOTUxNGIxZTJkMTgzMTYwOTZjN2Y5YyJdIHsgZm9udC1zaXplOiAxNHB4O2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OiAxLjJlbTsgfSBbZGF0YS10b29sc2V0LWJsb2Nrcy1maWVsZHMtYW5kLXRleHQ9ImY1Y2U4Yzg4YWI5NTE0YjFlMmQxODMxNjA5NmM3ZjljIl0gcCB7IGZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTRweDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDogMS4yZW07IH0g, The military in education & youth activities, Resources to use with political representatives, Anti-war activists battle to get their voices heard in WW1 centenary events, War crimes in video games should be punished, ICRC says, A Q&A document posted on the organisations website, Militarisation in everyday life in the UK: a conference report, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. What are war crimes and what is possible punishment if found guilty? The BBC were quoting The Red Cross in an interview with The Guardian - these were not the opinions of the BBC. Currently, the American Psychological Association is reviewing its 2005 statement that said there "appears to be evidence" of this; a coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, arguing that, based on the current research, some assertions in the statement "cannot be supported.". sheesh. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. So how can players be made accountable for their actions beyond simple gameplay devices? These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, you'll probably get a 'mission failed' message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. Thread starter Spawn; Start date Oct 5, 2013; Menu . Post your templates or request one instead! Of which Starsector is not. Tx38b. EVE Search - Question for my fellow criminal scum - player abilities. And like someone pointed out earlier, it's not like many countries that engage in combat actions often actually follow their own rules of engagement anyway. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? The enemy! In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. The U.S. insists that Russia should be held accountable for war crimes Rich_Boy_420 30 apr 2020. I just wanted the Sudetenland. You must log in or register to reply here. Monster_Slayer 1 may 2020. Or is it only bad if someone mods it so that it takes place in the Middle East instead of NYC? I remember my first go on Taito's explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-'em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. Never listen to games journalists. . Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? It essentially boils down to "shoot" and "don't shoot" targets like in the arcade shooters. Seems like a reasonable suggestion to improve the quality of videogames, if you ask me, but I like fiction that deals with consequences of war with ambiguity and complexity. F1 2013 - review | Games | The Guardian October 7, 2013 in Off-Topic Discussion. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. It's not interested in excising the offending scenarios from games entirely, arguing that "sanitizing videogames of such acts is not realistic" given such atrocities do occur in real conflict. On the other hand, the ICRC feels players found "respecting the law of armed conflict" should be rewarded. The ICRC is concerned that certain game scenarios could lead to a trivialization of serious violations of the law of armed conflict, they added. It is difficult to imagine a Call of Duty or Battlefield title in which shooting a civilian leads to a mission where the player is detained in a military prison for several months before being tried and sentenced. I also think more realism is always good in games. You know, I could continue to rant on this but I'm going to cut my reply short. War Crimes In Ukraine? Here's What Russia's Been Accused - Forbes If you are having trouble subscribing with this form, try the version here. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Crime and Punishment . ios notifications png Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Should actors be accountable for a murder in their movie? Re-start mission?". . purdu_2016 12 oct 2021. It's supposedly what we all agreed were the "rules" of war. What about the few people that 100% the entire CoD series? Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? We are not talking about censorship or banning anything, he added. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) Russia denies it engages in illegal attacks but proof of any use of illegal weaponry such as cluster bombs and any targeting of civilians or civilian buildings like schools and hospitals is already being collated. I don't think this was about introducing more reality to games, that was just the most convincing excuse they could conjure up. There is a big line between reality and the virtual world and for example, I cannot remember a video game shooter where I'm gunning civilians. Boy they would hate what I did with my evil characters in skyrim and fallout 4. In both Heavy Rain and Walking Dead, players face lethal moral decisions that don't end the game, or even have ludic consequences for the player, but yet play on the mind and colour the experience. gamers are sub-human. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising.